With the recent shooting of 6 to 7 year olds by a deranged
gunman that broke into Sandy Hook Elementary School, is the largely unregulated Second
Amendment slowly destroying the social fabric of America?
By: Ringo Bones
Despite the very tragic set of circumstances that lead to
the senseless shooting and deaths of 20 6 to 7 year olds in Sandy Hook
Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, it seems that Second Amendment
advocates in the United States seem to be clinging harder and tighter to their
political stance – and the right to bear arms – even if innocent bystanders
have to suffer. But why do a significant number of Americans clung on to the
oft misguided belief that private gun ownership is all that it takes to keep
the United States of America free from tyranny?
Sadly, in spite of the Second Amendment reminding and
reiterating the Federal government that the establishment of a “Well-regulated
militia shall not be infringed…the right to bear arms….” It seems that the
“well-regulated” part of the Second Amendment is often the oft ignored
stipulation of the Second Amendment whenever these “rednecks” exercise their
Second Amendment rights and establish their own “not-so-well-regulated-militia”.
A case in point is the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in
Oklahoma back in April 19, 1995 where a misguided unregulated redneck militia
led by Timothy McVeigh decided to dispense their own brand of justice on
Federal workers who are only tenuously related to their grievances with the
Federal government.
Assuming if the Second Amendment advocates are right when
they oft “romantically” depict private gun owners as holding back a tidal wave
of violence and crime in their neck of the woods, how come not a single Al
Qaeda inspired sleeper cell was ever subjected to a Citizens Arrest action by a
group of card carrying National Rifle Association (NRA) members since the
September 11, 2001 terror attacks? More often than not, over eager white-Anglo-Saxon-Protestant
Second Amendment advocates only hassle Americans of Muslim faith with no
connection to Al Qaeda whatsoever. And does this make a significant number of
card-carrying NRA members / private gun owners who don’t know how to
well-regulate themselves more a liability – rather than an asset – when it
comes to America’s over-burdened national security apparatus?
As of late, President Obama mentions of a “meaningful
action” to prevent the tragic shooting deaths of schoolchildren in Sandy Hook Elementary
School from ever happening again. By meaningful action mean tighter gun
controls and oversight of the sale and private ownership of handguns and
semi-automatic assault rifles by private citizens in America. And even though
the top brasses at the NRA may be right about gun violence statistically on the
decline in America since 1990 and gun ownership the lowest it has been in 40
years despite of a surge of purchase of handguns by pro Second Amendment
advocates during Pres. Obama’s election into the White House back in 2008,
tighter gun control and regulation could be the only meaningful action the
President can act on in the foreseeable future to avoid a repeat of the tragic
shooting deaths in Sandy Hook Elementary School. Even though gun related violence
is on the decline since 1990, America’s children need not to suffer the
country’s Second Amendment / private gun ownership obsession.
1 comment:
A meaningful gun regulation might be harder to achieve given that all of the teachers in America have all had their pension funds invested in gun companies like Smith & Wesson.
Post a Comment