Seen as the scope of plunder for those of us on the
disadvantaged side of the 20-year long dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos, are
the 3,000 pairs of the former Philippine First Lady a fitting monument to
despotism?
By: Ringo Bones
Given that the rate of extreme poverty more or less remained
the same since one of Asia’s most feared dictators by the name of Ferdinand
Marcos was booted out on that famed relatively bloodless EDSA Revolution of
1986, the recent BBC coverage of that notorious Imelda Marcos’ 3,000 pairs of
shoes falling into disrepair due to recent floods and years of unchecked
termite damage since their sequestration by the PCGG only raised more questions
about the method of the former Philippine First Lady’s madness when she decides
to have a runaway shoe fetish when most working class Filipinos can barely
afford an extra emergency pair of shoes, never mind three square meals a day.
With all that’s been said and done, will this make Imelda Marcos’ 3,000 pairs
of shoes nothing more than an anachronism of the long-gone decade of the
economic excesses of the go-go 1980s, or a genuine monument to despotism?
Given the very terrible civil war currently going on in
Syria could have happened here in the Philippines if the Marcos Dictatorship
had stubbornly clung on to power, the news coverage of the shoes being
renovated as just a mere trivial curiosity from a conspicuous consumption at
the expense of the poverty stricken from a bygone age only raises painful
memories to those who have endured through the Marcos Dictatorship first hand
and to the younger generation of Filipinos who had never experienced first hand
how it is like to have their whole village secretly massacred by government
soldiers under the behest of a bloodthirsty dictator. I just hope that this
won’t devolve into some historical footnote written by delusional war criminals
that managed to evade prosecution and now has inexplicably managed to acquire
their own political constituency.
1 comment:
According to my mom, if the Marcos family haven't left immediately during the 1986 EDSA Revolution, the Philippines would surely have been plunged into a bloody civil war back then like that currently going on Syria.
Post a Comment